The twelve-factor app manifesto recommends that you pass application configs as ENV variables. However, if your application requires a password, SSH private key, TLS Certificate, or any other kind of sensitive data, you shouldn't pass it alongside your configs.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b57e/6b57e0cc38f16b4fe4afbc63c8ba1484b55e66b9" alt="Fork and getenv example."
When you store your secret keys in an environment variable, you are prone to accidentally exposing them—exactly what we want to avoid. Here are a few reasons why ENV variables are bad for secrets:
- Given that the environment is implicitly available to the process, it's hard, if not impossible, to track access and how the contents get exposed (
ps -eww <PID>
). - It's common to have applications grab the whole environment and print it out for debugging or error reporting. So many secrets get leaked to PagerDuty that they have a well-greased internal process to scrub them from their infrastructure.
- Environment variables are passed down to child processes, which allows for unintended access. This breaks the principle of least privilege. Imagine that as part of your application, you call to a third-party tool to perform some action—all of a sudden that third-party tool has access to your environment, and god knows what it will do with it.
- When applications crash, it's common for them to store the environment variables in log-files for later debugging. This means plain-text secrets on disk.
- Putting secrets in ENV variables quickly turns into tribal knowledge. New engineers who are not aware of the sensitive nature of specific environment variables will not handle them appropriately/with care (filtering them to sub-processes, etc).
Overall, secrets in ENV variables break the principle of least surprise, are a bad practice, and will lead to the eventual leak of secrets.
If not env variables then what?
At a previous job I helped solve this problem with a really elegant solution: Keywhiz. At Docker we went a step further and built a similar solution directly into Docker itself. If you're using swarm, you now have a trivial way to manage your secrets securely:
openssl rand -base64 32 | docker secret create secure-secret -
And that's it. You can now use your secret:
docker service create --secret="secure-secret" redis:alpine
And make your application read the secret contents from the in-memory tmps that gets created under /run/secrets/secure-secret
:
# cat /run/secrets/secure-secret
eHwX8kV8sFt/y30WASgz8kimnKhUkCrt07XMrmewYr8=
By integrating secrets into Docker, we were able to deliver a solution for the secrets management that follows these principles:
- Secrets are always encrypted, both in transit and at rest.
- Secrets are difficult to unintentionally leak when consumed by the final application.
- Secrets access adheres to the principle of least-privilege.
Having an easy-to-use, secure-by-default secret distribution mechanism is exactly what developers and ops need to solve the secrets management problem once and for all.